|
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 of the United Kingdom (UK) implemented fundamental changes to the admissibility of evidence relating to character, in respect to defendants and others. The Act is far-reaching, providing for the admissibility of previous convictions in support of a propensity to commit like-offences and untruthfulness.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Criminal+Justice+Act+2003+&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&TYPE=QS&PageNumber=1&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=902928&ActiveTextDocId=903058&filesize=3527 )〕 Common law rules in relation to the admissibility of bad character evidence have been abolished, with the existence of one exception.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=Criminal+Justice+Act+2003+&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&TYPE=QS&PageNumber=1&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=902928&ActiveTextDocId=903052&filesize=802 )〕 The legislation draws heavily on the Law Commission Paper No. 273.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/lc273sum(1).pdf )〕 ==Definition== Bad character evidence is evidence of, or a disposition towards misconduct; other than evidence which has to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged or is evidence of misconduct in connection with the investigation or prosecution of that offence.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/ukpga_20030044_en_12#pt11-ch1-pb1-l1g98 )〕 Misconduct is defined as "the commission of an offence or other reprehensible behaviour".〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/30044--l.htm#112 )〕 Bad character in relation to the alleged facts offence itself has always been admissible for obvious reasons. The Act provides for different rules in relation to the bad character of defendants, and that of non-defendants. In assessing the probative value of evidence it is assumed to be true, unless there is material to suggest the contrary.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/30044--l.htm#109 )〕 Apart from evidence of previous convictions, other evidence, amounting to "reprehensible behaviour" is admissible. The Government stated the following during debate: :"Examples of where it might be appropriate to admit such evidence include circumstances where evidence on a number of charges being tried concurrently is cross-admissible in respect of the other charges. :It might also be appropriate to admit evidence relating to charges on which the defendant was acquitted, as I have already cited in the example of.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldjudgmt/jd000622/z-1.htm )〕 It would be unfortunate if an argument were to be accepted that, because a person has not actually been convicted of the offence, it cannot be said that the evidence shows that he has indeed committed such an offence and it is therefore excluded". 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「bad character evidence」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|